Introduction
The mental health of veterans is a critical concern that demands effective outreach strategies. Two prominent programs, Solid Start and In Transition, have been initiated to connect veterans with necessary mental health services. However, the effectiveness of these programs varies significantly. This article delves into the reasons behind the superior performance of Solid Start over In Transition and provides insights into how oversight and accountability can enhance the outcomes of such programs.
Understanding the Outreach Strategies
Solid Start: A Comprehensive Approach
Solid Start stands out due to its robust outreach strategy. The program employs a multifaceted approach to ensure veterans are well-informed and have multiple opportunities to engage with mental health services. Here are the key elements of the Solid Start strategy:
- Initial Contact: Solid Start sends an advanced email and a detailed packet of information to veterans. This initial contact serves as a comprehensive introduction to the available services.
- Persistent Follow-Up: The program makes up to seven phone calls at each of the three touch points spread across a one-year period. This persistent follow-up ensures that veterans are consistently reminded of the available resources and are given ample opportunities to engage.
- Multiple Entry Points: By creating multiple touch points, Solid Start increases the likelihood that veterans will engage with the program. Even if initial attempts are unsuccessful, the repeated efforts increase the chances of eventual contact.
In Transition: Limited Efforts
In contrast, In Transition has a more limited approach:
- Fewer Attempts: The program makes up to three phone calls, but in practice, due to demand and resource constraints, often only one or two calls are made.
- Quick Enrollment Removal: If the initial attempts are unsuccessful, individuals are quickly removed from the program. This practice significantly reduces the program’s reach and effectiveness.
- Lack of Persistence: The limited number of contact attempts and the quick removal of individuals from the program contribute to low participation rates.
Why Solid Start Works Better
The superior effectiveness of Solid Start can be attributed to its higher level of effort and persistence. The program’s commitment to making multiple contact attempts ensures that veterans are more likely to be reached and engaged. In contrast, In Transition’s limited efforts and quick removal of individuals from the program lead to low participation rates.
Overlap and Confusion
Despite the differences in approach, there is some overlap between Solid Start and In Transition. This overlap can be confusing for veterans, especially those who may not fully understand the programs or their benefits. The overlapping contact attempts during specific periods can lead to confusion and may dilute the efficacy of both programs.
Recommendations for Improvement
To address the issues identified, the Joint Executive Committee has been advised to:
- Review Program Overlap: Understand the different touch points and their timing to avoid confusion and ensure effective reach.
- Monitor Effectiveness: Assess the effectiveness of each program’s outreach strategies to identify areas for improvement.
- Implement Oversight: Hold contractors accountable for specific goals and performance metrics, particularly for the In Transition program.
Implementing GAO Recommendations
To implement these recommendations, the leadership within the Defense Health Agency (DHA) should:
- Establish Oversight: Monitor the In Transition program and hold contractors accountable for specific goals and performance metrics.
- Set Performance Goals: Define clear goals for outreach and ensure that contractors are meeting these goals.
- Ensure Early Contact: Reach out to eligible individuals earlier in the transition process to maximize the chances of engagement.
Commitment to Improvement
The leadership has committed to implementing these recommendations and will follow up at the beginning of the next fiscal year cycle. This commitment demonstrates a serious effort to enhance the effectiveness of these programs and improve the mental health outcomes for veterans.
Conclusion
The effectiveness of outreach strategies is crucial for connecting veterans with essential mental health services. Solid Start’s persistent and comprehensive approach has proven to be more effective than In Transition’s limited efforts. By implementing the GAO’s recommendations and establishing robust oversight, the DHA can enhance the reach and effectiveness of both programs, ultimately improving the mental health support available to veterans.
One Comment